Wambui v National Transport and Safety Authority (Appeal E003 of 2024) [2024] KETLABT 326 (KLR) (4 March 2024) (Judgment)
Neutral citation:
[2024] KETLABT 326 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
Appeal E003 of 2024
A Kamotho, Chair, Joseph Mcdonald, Maryan Hajir, James Ngomeli & Waithira Muiruri, Members
March 4, 2024
Between
Micheal Kimani Wambui
Appellant
and
National Transport and Safety Authority
Respondent
Judgment
Introduction
1.The appellant, Michael Kimani Wambui is a male adult of identification number 24013064 residing in Nairobi County.
2.The respondent, National Transport and Safety Authority (NTSA) is established under section 3 of the National Transport and Safety Authority Act No.33 of 2012 and has the responsibility to the Cabinet Secretary on matters relating to road transport and safety, implement policies relating to road transport and safety, plan, manage and regulate the road transport system, ensure the provision of safe, reliable and efficient road transport services and to administer the Traffic Act.
Appellant’s Case.
3.The appellant filed a memorandum of appeal at the Transport Licensing Appeals Board on 13th February 2024 stating that the respondent had omitted classes D1,D2 and D3 in his smart driving license yet the same had been endorsed in his old driving license.
4.His prayers on the matter were that the National Transport Safety Authority to be ordered to reinstate the missing classes to enable him apply for a public service vehicle license.
Respondent’s Case.
5.The respondent authority did not have any objection to the appellant’s application after he provided evidence proving that he had the said missing classes stamped on his old driving license.
Issues to determine.
6.Whether the appellant had presented enough evidence showing that he had classes D1,D2 and D3 stamped on his old driving license and whether he is entitled to having the same included in his smart driving license.
Analysis and Determination.
Whether the appellant had adduced enough evidence.
7.Section 33(1) of the Traffic Act provides that:
8.The appellant, alongside his application, had included a copy of his old driving license which had been stamped and authorized by the respondent. The driving license had classes D1,D2, and D3 stamped by the respondent meaning he was authorized to drive vehicles under that class.
9.Section 82 of The Traffic Act states that:
10.The appellant, having produced his old driving license and proved that he is qualified to drive vehicles under the said class and he had stamps to prove the same, the respondent has a duty to include the missing classes in his smart driving license.
Orders.Having considered the facts and the law applicable to this case, the Transport Licensing Appeals Board hereby makes the following order:i.That, effective immediately, the respondent reinstates classes D1,D2 and D3 on the appellant’s smart driving license.ii.Each party shall bear own costs.
DELIVERED VIRTUALLY BY THE TRANSPORT LICENSING LICENSING APPEALS BOARD ON THIS 4TH DAY OF MARCH 2024.DR. ADRIAN KAMOTHO - CHAIRPERSONJOSEPH MCDONALD - MEMBERMARYAN HAJIR - MEMBERJAMES NGOMELI - MEMBERWAITHIRA MUIRURI - MEMBER