Gachaki v Kinyua (Application 1 of 2016) [2017] KESC 21 (KLR) (24 March 2017) (Ruling)

Gachaki v Kinyua (Application 1 of 2016) [2017] KESC 21 (KLR) (24 March 2017) (Ruling)

1.Upon perusing the application dated 19th January and filed on 22nd January, 2016 for extension of time to file a Notice of Appeal and;
2.UPON reading the affidavit of Joseph Kinyua Gachaki in support thereof, sworn on 19th January, 2016;
3.We have considered the written submissions on record for the applicant and the respondent. The applicant herein, contends that, the delay in filing a Notice of Appeal, is not attributable to any fault or complacency on his part. The applicant submits that, the delay was occasioned by financial difficulties on his part, and a misapprehension of the law on the part of his Advocate. The respondent opposes the application, on grounds that, the reasons advanced by the applicant, for the inordinate delay in filing the Notice of Appeal, cannot justify the extension of time as sought.
4.Having considered the application, by a unanimous decision of this Bench, we make the following Orders under Section 23 (2) (b) of the Supreme Court Act, and Rule 21 of the Supreme Court Rules (2015).
Orders Reasons
The application dated 19th January, 2016 is hereby dismissed with costs. No compelling reasons have been presented to the Court as a justification for the inordinate delay.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 24THDAY OF MARCH, 2017.…………………….M. K. IBRAHIMJUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT …………………….S. C. WANJALAJUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURTI certify that this is a true copy of the originalREGISTRARSUPREME COURT OF KENYA
▲ To the top
Date Case Court Judges Outcome Appeal outcome
24 March 2017 Gachaki v Kinyua (Application 1 of 2016) [2017] KESC 21 (KLR) (24 March 2017) (Ruling) This judgment Supreme Court MK Ibrahim, SC Wanjala  
None ↳ Civil Application No. 3 of 2015 None Dismissed