IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT BUNGOMA
REVISION NO. 1 OF 2005.
MALIK MOHAMMED KIPSANG…………………………………….APPLICANT
VS
REPUBLIC………………………………………………………….RESPONDENT
RULING ON REVISION
This matter was brought to my attention pursuant to the provisions of sections 362 and 364 (1) of the criminal procedure code. The issue at stake is that the Public Health Officer has obtained orders of eviction against 7 tenants occupying premises situated in L.R. No. BUNGOMA MUNICIPALITY/1368. via Bungoma S.P.M’s Misc. Criminal Application No. 4 of 2005. In fact the tenants have been given notices to vacate.
I am yet to call for the file to be placed before me so that I may peruse and make a decision over it. That will obviously take time and the orders complained of may be executed before a decision is made. At this stage I direct that execution of the orders issued on 31.1.2005 be stayed pending the outcome of this Revision. In the same breath the Deputy Registrar is directed to place before me the original file No. Bungoma S.P.M. Misc Cr. Application No. 4 of 2005 for perusal and further orders.
DATED AND DELIVERED THIS 10th .DAY OF February 2005
Cited documents 0
Documents citing this one 1
Judgment 1
| 1. | M. Dalmar Trading Company Ltd v Gakibe & another (Criminal Revision E170 of 2022) [2022] KEHC 13450 (KLR) (Crim) (4 October 2022) (Ruling) Mentioned | 1 citation |