Karanca v County Government of Meru & 5 others (Environment & Land Case E008 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 5543 (KLR) (17 July 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation:
[2024] KEELC 5543 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
Environment & Land Case E008 of 2023
CK Nzili, J
July 17, 2024
Between
Geoffrey Kinja Karanca
Plaintiff
and
The County Government Of Meru
1st Defendant
The Chief Land Registrar
2nd Defendant
The County Land Registrar Meru
3rd Defendant
The Director Of Surveys
4th Defendant
The County Director Of Surveys, Meru
5th Defendant
The National Housing Corporation
6th Defendant
Ruling
1.When this matter came up for hearing on 13.6.2024, learned litigation counsel representing the 2nd & 3rd defendants told the court that Section 12 of the Government Proceedings Act had not been complied with by the plaintiff to include the Hon. Attorney General as a party to the suit. The counsel insisted that the pleadings by the plaintiff have to be amended to formally bring on board the Hon. AG so that a statement of defence can be filed.
2.Learned counsels Mr. Opulu and Maithya for the plaintiff submitted that their client had no complaint against the Hon. AG.
3.They termed the issue raised by the 2nd and 3rd defendants for not filing a statement as a delaying tactic.
4.Mr. Opulu submitted that the Chief Land Registrar and the director of surveys were capable of being sued without joining the Hon. AG.
5.In a rejoinder, Miss Mbaikyatta learned counsel submitted that unless the Hon. AG was joined, government officers such as the 2nd and 3rd defendants could not be defended by the Hon. AG.
6.The question as to whether it is mandatory to sue the A.G. was tackled in the Council of Governors and Others v Senate & others (2015) eKLR. The court said that whereas the constitution allows the Hon. AG the right to represent the national government in court proceedings, it does not mandatory stipulate that the Hon. AG should be sued in all instances where the organ of a national government has been sued.
7.Section 12 (1) of the Government Proceedings Act provides the subject to the provisions of any written law Civil proceedings by or against the government shall be instituted by or against the A.G as the case might be. Under Order 1 Rule 10 (2) Civil Procedure Rules to join a party is the discretion of a party by moving the court where there is a necessity or whose presence will enable the court to effectually and completely adjudicate upon a matter. It can happen at any stage of a suit. See JMK v MWN & another (2015) eKLR. He or she must be a necessary party where the ultimate order or decree cannot be enforced without his participation. See Julius Meme v Republic & another (2004) eKLR.
8.The suit before the court is against the 2nd – 4th defendants touching on their role regarding the plaintiff's title to land. The Hon. AG is not answering for the issues raised against the 2nd – 5th defendants.
9.The 2nd – 5th defendants have not stated how the necessity of the Hon. AG will help them in answering the issues pleaded by the plaintiff against them.
10.The upshot is I find no basis to order that the plaint be amended to include the Hon. AG as a substantive party to the suit if the 2nd – 5th defendants do not wish to defend the suit the matter shall proceed as per the law.
11.The plaintiff is at liberty to make the necessary applications in the absence of a statement of defence by the said parties.
DATED, SIGNED, AND DELIVERED VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS/OPEN COURT AT MERUON THIS 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2024In presence ofC.A Kananu/MukamiPlaintiffSituma for the 6th defendantMwirigi B for the 1st defendantMaithya for Opulu for the plaintiffMbaikyatta for the 2nd – 5th defendantHON. C K NZILIJUDGE