IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT KISUMU
(CORAM: E.M.GITHINJI, HANNAH OKWENGU &
J. MOHAMMED, JJ.A.)
CIVIL APPEAL ELECTION PETITION NO. 4 OF 2018
BETWEEN
PETER ODIMA KHASAMULE......................................APPELLANT
AND
INDEPENDENT ELECTORAL AND
BOUNDARIES COMMISSION (I.E.B.C.)...........1ST RESPONDENT
THE RETURNING OFFICER BUSIACOUNTY,
FREDRICK APOPA...............................................2ND RESPONDENT
SOSPETER ODEKE OJAAMONG......................3RD RESPONDENT
(Being Notice to show cause why the Notice of Appeal should not be struck out under Section 85 A (1) (a) of the Election Act and Rule 83 of the Court of Appeal Rules
in
ELECTION PETITION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4 OF 2018)
*******************************************
ORDER OF THE COURT
The advocates for Peter Odima Khasamule who filed a Notice of Appeal on 19th February, 2018 signifying an intention to appeal against the decision of the Election Court dated 12th February, 2018 have not appeared today to show cause why the notice of appeal should not be stuck out.
Since the intended appellant did not file an appeal within the 30 days stipulated by section 85 A (1) (a) of the Elections Act as read with Rule 8(5) of the Court of Appeal Election Petition Rules, 2017, the Notice of Appeal has become futile.
Accordingly, it is struck out under Rule 84 of the Court of Appeal Rules as read with Rule 4(2) of the Court of Appeal Election Petition Rules, 2017 with no orders as to cost.
Made at Kisumu this 21st day of June, 2018.
E. M. GITHINJI
…………………………..
JUDGE OF APPEAL
HANNAH OKWENGU
……………………………..
JUDGE OF APPEAL
J. MOHAMMED
……………………………..
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy
of the original
DEPUTY REGISTRAR