Skip to document content
Go to main menu
Go to search
About Us
Judicial Profiles
Product Catalogue
Careers
Contact Us
Site Map
Search
Search
Home
Case Law
Superior Courts
Subordinate Courts
Small Claims Court
Civil and Human Rights Tribunals
Commercial Tribunals
Environment and Land Tribunals
Intellectual Property Tribunals
Regional and International Courts
Tribunals
Elections
Laws of Kenya
The Constitution of Kenya
Laws of Kenya
Treaties
EAC Legislation
Counties
Cause List
Kenya Gazette
Publications
Bench Bulletin
Case Digests
Commission Reports
Journals
Kenya Law News
Kenya Law Reports
Law Related Articles
Weekly Newsletter
Parliament
Committee Reports
Bills
Blog
Log in
Home
Judgments
Superior Courts
Court of Appeal
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Kenindia Assurance Company Limited v First National Finance Bank Limited [2008] KECA 25 (KLR)
Download PDF (0 bytes)
Report
Report a problem
Kenindia Assurance Company Limited v First National Finance Bank Limited [2008] KECA 25 (KLR)
Copy citation
Document detail
Citations
- / 2
Citation
Kenindia Assurance Company Limited v First National Finance Bank Limited [2008] KECA 25 (KLR)
Copy
Media Neutral Citation
[2008] KECA 25 (KLR)
Copy
Court
Court of Appeal
Court station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Case number
? 328 of 2002
Alternative citations
Kenindia Assurance Company Limited v First National Finance Bank Limited
Copy
Judgment date
31 October 2008
Language
English
Type
Judgment
Case action
Judgment
Court division
Civil
Skip to document content
Pages
Search
Loading PDF...
This document is 0 bytes. Do you want to load it?
Load document
▲ To the top
Cited documents
0
Documents citing this one
2
Judgment
2
1.
Magnate Ventures Limited v Credit Bank PLC (Commercial Case E059 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 2234 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (24 March 2023) (Ruling)
Explained
1 citation
2.
Azicon Kenya Limited v Sinohydro Corporation Limited; Receiver, Chase Bank Limited (In Receivership) (Interested Party) (Commercial Case E284 of 2019) [2023] KEHC 19380 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (30 June 2023) (Ruling)
Explained